|
Recipe
for Building a Medical Home
One Practice Teams' Story on Quality Improvements
around Medical Home: Achievements and Insights
Presentation
Summary of Achievements
and Insights
- Almost 600 Children with Special Health Care Needs
(CSHCN) identified in registry and in Medical Manager
with complexity scores
- Care Coordinator does Pre-visit Contacts for 11 docs;
from 3 hrs./wk to full-time
- 93 % of Families find pre-visit contacts helpful
- Printing 3rd ed. CSHCN pocket phonebook; 3rd edition
of transition referral options
- Year 3 of tracking improved patterns of Emergency Department
(ED) and after-hours utilization
-
Boardmaker used for communication-impaired CSHCN
- Planning for Statewide Medical Home Learning Collaborative
for CSHCN
- Docs re-educated on coding for CSHCN
- Title V 3 year grant on MH Implementation
- Creating pilot project with Blue Cross/Blue Shield
(BCBS) around metrics for Medical Home measurement
- Held forum with our practice, Parents and School Admin.
around partnering for CSHCN in schools
- Held “Listening Session” with our practice's
parents to identify needs
- Streamlined “checkout” process
- Joining NC Medicaid Managed Care Network
- Computer Access to Duke/University North Carolina
Who We Are
- Our Practice: Chapel Hill Pediatrics
and Adolescents, PA (CHPA)
- Suburban private practice with 2 offices in Chapel Hill
and Durham, NC
- 11 Pediatricians, 4 full-time, 7 part-time; 6 F.T.E.
- Duke University and University of North Carolina Medical
Centers within 15 miles; > 30 year collaboration with
both centers
- 85% Managed Care
- 7.45% Private Pay
- 7.1% Medicaid + SCHIP; just joined new Medicaid Network
in our 4 county area
- Office hours 365 days a year; extended office hours
M-F until 7 pm
- Care for children/youth from birth to age 21
- Do not presently have an Electronic Medical Record
(EMR); heading toward EMR
Essential Components
for Medical Home
The Beginning: Focus on Medical Home efforts
began in April 2003, as we began participation in the NICHQ
Medical Home Learning Collaborative for CSHCN that used
the Model
for Improvement (tests of change on a small scale, with
evaluation and revision to direct expansion of change) to
initiate and sustain changes in care delivery
We have identified 6 essential components to implementation
of Medical Home concepts as defined by AAP
Policy Statement
- Relationships
- Collaborative relationships between parent/child/CHPA
- Enhanced connections between CHPA/community
- Collaboration between Primary/Specialty MD’s/Training
Programs
- Interaction between MD’s/Insurers
- Dialogue between MD’s/State of NC on care
for CSHCN statewide
- Interface between MD’s/Policy makers to underscore
clinical need for Medical Homes for all children,
but especially CSHCN
- Ready Access
- ADA
approved entries, exam rooms, bathrooms
- Offices on local bus lines
- Handicapped parking slots at door
- Office hours in evenings, Saturdays, Sundays, holidays
- Advice nurses both day and night
- On-call provider 24/7, 365
- Same day appointments reliably available
- Care coordination to provide assistance with
referrals, preparations for visits, communication with
specialists, assistance with support services
- Registry
- Identification of CSHCN, defined by CAHMI screener
- Gradual registration by MD/staff recall, computer
review by diagnosis, identification in process of
care.
- Identification of CSHCN gives mechanism for proper
scheduling/coding, recall by diagnosis for services
like Synagis/flu shots
- Working data base for care coordination services
- Resources
- Identified clinical providers for all sorts of services
(lactation, domestic violence, psychiatry, dentistry,
PT, etc), with data available for use in the process
of clinical care
- Identification of clinical and policy-making individuals
at Medical Centers for referrals and advocacy
- Location of funding sources for clinical services
(example: Project FAST at the Arc for un-funded care
items like wheelchair ramps)
- Identification of high-quality Parent Support Links
- Establishment of technological resources (such as
computer links with Duke/UNC for information exchange
around clinical care)
- Development of constructive linkages with insurers
- Reimbursement
- Federal/State Policy level discussions with ALL
insurers to address costs of care for growing numbers
of CSHCN.
- Ongoing evaluation of the practice’s coding
procedures, with data collection for insurer contract
negotiation
- Formal, annual contract renegotiations with insurers
- CSHCN coding education for providers, with coding
reviews to educate on missed charges, inadequate documentation
- Documentation of cost-saving features of Medical
Home; decreased ED utilization, decreased “downstream
utilization” such as hospitalization
- Development of incentives for practices making Medical
Home quality improvement efforts (“pay for performance”)
- Funding to continue clinical services (care coordination
work, data collection, clinical education, parent
links)
- Recognition/documentation of/payment for: telephone
calls,
care coordination, advice lines, after hours services,
records review and form completion
- Recruitment
- Identification of Practices with “inclination”
to be Medical Homes
- “Tool Kits” of forms, directories
- “Spoon-feeding” (clinical education,
coding, parent support systems) to encourage other
practices to embrace Medical Home features
- Recognition of those providers by AAP, Medical
Centers and insurers
- Evidence that provision of Medical Home services
can be financially viable for the clinician/practice
| NOTE:
This entry in Pediatric Coding for CSHCN is
an extreme disincentive to the development of the
Medical Home concept.
“ The clinician who actively solicits
and accepts children with special health care needs
into his practice and provides them with the tenets
of a caring, comprehensive, compassionate, clinically
astute, and coordinated medical home is acting on
the highest ethical and moral dictates of our profession,
but is likely placing himself or herself in a situation
that may become fiscally untenable.”
“Such a clinician must be particularly
astute at negotiating an enhanced capitation or carve-out
arrangement for such patients. . .”
--- Coding for Pediatrics,
2005
|
REAL
ACCOMPLISHMENTS in areas of Essential Components
1. RELATIONSHIPS
- Boardmaker
used for communication-impaired CSHCN
- 93 % of Families find pre-visit contacts helpful
- Stronger collaboration with NC Title V through grant/quarterly
meetings
- Established working group with BCBS senior medical
directors
- Computer Access to Duke/UNC.
- Joined NC Medicaid Managed Care Network
- Held “Listening Session” with CHPA parents
to identify potential areas of practice improvement
2. READY ACCESS
- Streamlined “checkout” process
- Care Coordinators with direct phone lines
3. REGISTRY
- Over 600 CSHCN identified in registry and in our Medical
Manager, with complexity scores
- Registry used for pt. recall for flu shots, Synagis,
and local support group on autism
4. RESOURCES
- Care Coordinator does Pre-visit Contacts for 11 docs;
from 3 hrs./wk to full-time.
- Care Coordinators assist with referrals to specialists,
assuring pertinent records are sent
- Printing 3rd ed. CSHCN pocket phonebook; 3rd edition
of transition referral options
- Held forum with CHPA, Parents and School Admin. around
partnering for CSHCN in schools.
- Title V 3 year grant on MH Implementation.
5. REIMBURSEMENT
- Year 3 of tracking improved patterns of ED and after
-hours utilization
- Docs re-educated on coding for CSHCN
- Considering pilot project with BCBS around metrics
for Medical Home measurement/pay for performance
6. RECRUITMENT
- By referral from Title V, have assisted other practices
in details of registry development
- Presented “what we’ve learned” at
Medical Home Learning Collaborative 2
- Contributed the pre-visit contact protocol to Maternal
Child Health Bureau’s “Promising Approaches”
document on interfacing primary and specialty Pediatric
care.
- Will be presenting work on registry at North Carolina
Healthcare Information and Communications Alliance (NCHICA)
in 5-06
How Did You Do
That?? Detailed descriptions of Implementation
Ready Access through Development of Care
Coordination Position (pre-visit contacts, and assistance
with referrals, capture of episodic care).
- Began Care Coordination 1-3 hours week, doing pre-visit
contacts, funded by BCBS Foundation Grant. Initial care
coordinator was lab director, who added 1-3 hrs./wk
- Developed a Pre-visit
Contact form
- Starting with 3 MD’s, Care coordinator (CC) identified
CSHCN coming for checkups in next 2 weeks. MD’s
who registered their CSHCN first were first to receive
pre-visit contacts.
- Using pre-visit contact form, CC made pre-visit contact
phone calls to parents of CSHCN with upcoming physicals.
- CC assembled all consults, lab results, ED records since
child’s prior checkup, identified parent concerns,
and arranged for EMLA cream if labs to be drawn.
- CC assures that adequate time has been scheduled for
visit.
- CC gives chart and data to child’s MD for data
review
- Pre-visit contacts is entered in chart with physical
form
- CC attaches Parent Survey form to chart for parent response
on pre-visit contact value
Referrals
- Educated staff member who had previously assisted with
referrals to focus on CSHCN. Parents were directed to
that staff member for assistance with referrals, test
scheduling
- Referrals staff began recording all referrals to assure
follow up if needed
- Referrals began to develop data base of contacts in
both Medical Centers and the community for referrals.
Added fax numbers to data base for communication
- Parents began to access referrals directly for problem
solving around appointments
- CC assists referrals around more clinical issues/questions
| As
CC and Referrals work proved useful to the 3 MD’s,
their services were gradually expanded to more MD’s.
Addition of a Title V grant permitted funding for
increased staff time as more patients are registered.
General acceptance by parents and all MD’s has
led to development of job description for CC and budgeting
for the position in 2006. Title V grant continues
thru 2005-6, and CC/Referrals position is now covered
full-time by 2 people who work as CC/Referrals part
time. |
“Capture” of children who appear only
for episodic care
- Recognized that many children with chronic conditions
utilize
regular and after-hours visits for “crisis management”
and do not
have regular physicals, chronic condition management visits
- MD seeing patient notes lack of checkups, delayed immunizations,
lack of
Asthma plan, etc. and gives child’s name, birth
date and chart number to
CC.
- CC notifies parent to make appointment for physical
and does pre-visit contacts.
- CC enters child in registry and office computer.
- CC identifies obstacles to regular care ( transportation,
parent work hours, lack of insurance?) and works to address
obstacles.
Registry development (from no registry to over
600 kids with SHCN)
- Registry includes: Name, birth date, chart number,
primary MD, insurer, major diagnoses, and identification
in Medical Manager as “Special”
- Paper survey to all docs to recall their CSHCN (most
complex children, children whose visits always take more
time, CSHCN who are technologically dependent, children
in group homes or residential care). Recall improved by
listing diagnoses such as Down Syndrome, seizure disorder,
cerebral palsy, bipolar disorder, congenital heart disease,
autism, childhood malignancy, etc. to prompt recall
- Computer recall by Diagnosis (pre maturity, asthma,
etc.) from office admin. system (ours is Medical Manager)
- Initially tried internet based software Docsite
as part of Medical Home Learning Collaborative. Found
it to be unwieldy and expensive, so went to paper and
Excel; presently looking at Filemaker
and awaiting EMR
- Gave incentive for MD’s/staff to identify/register
by beginning pre-visit contacts. Pre-visit contacts prompt
preparation for CSHCN’s checkups, encourage proper
time scheduling, and identify parent concerns/need for
pain control prior to exam
(see Recipe #2 for more on pre-visit
contacts)
- Assigned complexity scores as “ticket”
for pre-visit contacts
- Began with only 3 MD’s receiving pre-visit contacts,
and gradually increased to serve all 11 MD’s
- Parent survey of value of pre-visit contact document
that 93% of our parents find pre-visit contacts“very
helpful”. Initial survey was mailed to parents who
had had pre-visit contacts in past year, then revised
to be given to parents right after visit. Parents prefer
the immediate opportunity to give feedback.
- Registry data permits “tracking” of ED utilization,
after-hours visits, and subspecialty visits for those
CSHCN insured with BCBS (our primary payor)
- Registry data used for recall for Synagis, flu shots,
and diagnosis-based educational sessions (autism)
- Registry data used to invite parents to educational
forum and listening session
- Registry data encourages proper time scheduling for
appointment making care more efficient and decreasing
wait times.
- Registry permits advance identification of children
needing Boardmaker for communication assistance at clinical
visit
Resources,
clinical and financial
Identifying Clinical Resources for CSHCN
- While both Duke and UNC have formal phonebooks of their
specialists, we recognized that many of the community
providers/services we used were unidentified and required
leaving the exam room or a call-back to give the parent
referral information
- Sent survey to all MD’s, asking for the specialists
to whom they often referred/preferred in the following
areas:
| Audiology |
Developmental Evaluations |
OT/Feeding/Oral Motor |
Augmented Communication
Assistive Technology |
Developmental Therapists |
Podiatry |
| Autism |
Eating Disorders |
PT |
| Child Abuse |
Gynecology, Adolescent |
Rehab.Specialists |
| Child Psychiatry/Psychology |
Lactation Services |
Speech |
| Community Physicians |
Nutrition |
Substance Abuse |
| Dentistry for Children |
Orthotics |
|
Promise of a copy of the directory for those MD’s
who responded was incentive
to participate.
- Dr. Lail, with help from Title V and parents, collected
contact data for service
providers in other areas, including:
| NC State Programs for CSHCN |
Health Departments for 4 surrounding
counties |
Social Services |
| Baby Nurses |
Home Health Care/Equipment |
Social Security |
| Car seats for CSHCN |
Parent to Parent Connections |
Travel for CSHCN |
| Early Intervention contacts for 4 surrounding
counties |
Rare Disorders |
Vocational Rehab. |
| G-Tube and Trach care contacts at Med Centers |
Recreation for CSHCN |
We also added numbers for local hospitals,
ERs at all hospitals, Poison Control and Rabies
Control, as well as CAP programs, and the State
Special Needs Hotline. Special notations, such as
“takes Medicaid” or “only sees
adolescents” are in margin. |
| Grief Counseling/Hospice |
Respite/Residential Care for CSHCN |
| Group Homes for CSHCN |
School Systems |
- This directory, was printed in a pocket-sized, 4X6 inch
format, coil bound to fit in
doctor’s pocket for access while in process of care.
- Empty pages were left in the back for changes/additions.
- Book was used by MD’s, nurses, CC as an INTERNAL
DOCUMENT. Book is not circulated to parents.
- Directory gradually used by all MD’s
- After 1 year in use, directory updated. MD’s
requested to send in the changes they’d made thru
the year. Staff called numbers of less frequently used
providers to assure accuracy, and book reprinted with
additions/corrections
- After second year in use, same process used to print
3rd edition. All MD’s now
routinely dependent on the phonebook, and CC is working
on maintaining computer data base of resources for her
clinical encounters with patients.
- Initial funding for phonebook thru BCBS Foundation,
and subsequently through
Title V Medical Home Grant.
Identifying Financial Resources for Quality Improvements:
- To obtain funding for CHPA to participate in NICHQ’s
Medical Home Learning Collaborative (MHLC) , Dr. Lail
solicited support from BCBS Foundation. Division of Medical
Assistance matched funds to permit attendance in collaborative
and pilot of care coordination, registry development and
resource identification.
- Title V had partial participation in the M HLC, and
subsequently offered funding with a grant to continue
quality improvements after MHLC completed.
Reimbursement
| “Although
inadequate reimbursement for services offered in the
medical home remains a very significant barrier to
full implementation of this concept,4,5 reimbursement
is not the subject of this statement. It deserves
coverage in other AAP forums”. AAP Medical Home
Policy statement.
Few practices elect,
in their very busy clinical days, to embark on quality
improvements in their practices that are financially
non-viable. Neither do they choose to add to their
already-long list of non-reimbursed services. Inherent
in our Medical Homework has been the imperative that
providing a Medical Home, particularly for CSHCN,
cannot provoke ongoing financial losses for the practice.
|
We have worked on reimbursement for our Medical
Home interventions in six arenas.
- Proper coding for work done, and MD education for proper
coding.
- Charge capture
- Documentation of the financial value of Medical Home
services, particularly to insurers
- Aggressive approach to insurers for contract renegotiations.
- Funding from external sources, such as BCBS Foundation
and NC Title V grants.
- Increasing MD efficiency with resources while in the
process of care and care- coordination to permit maximal
MD time in revenue producing activities.
Proper Coding for Work Done
- Our billing personnel (trained in coding) reviewed 6
CSHCN charts from each physician to evaluate adequacy
of coding, with feedback about missed charges and under-coding.
This review clarified that MD’s needed more coding
education.
- Practice engaged coding educator, and continues to track
MD coding practices. Particular attention to the use of
modifiers for complex well-child care proved valuable.
- Practice changed checkout procedure so co pays were
collected prior to visit, permitting MD to retain billing
sheet until he/she had time to do more careful billing
- Our MD “culture” had a long history of
under-coding—partially due to lack of coding education,
but also due to the “we are nice guys” mentality
and the knowledge that parents are young people and health
care is expensive. With our large Managed Care population,
over 80% of our families paid only a co pay—no matter
how extensive or lengthy their care was. Clarifying this
point seemed to help MD’s understand that they must
charge for what they do.
- Using the registry to help schedule longer appointments
for CSHCN has permitted MD’s to spend effective
time with CSHCN and charge for the time expended. Some
of our under-coding culture arose from the fact that the
MD’s felt they had not fully addressed this complex
patients’ needs, and so under-coded for the visit.
6) Proper time scheduling for CSHCN decreases the likelihood
of long office waits because the “doctor is running
behind”. Some of our docs were apologetically under-coding
because a patient had had to wait for them.
Charge Capture
- MD’s and staff were reminded (again) to charge
for all services provided. Hearing and vision screens
for PE’s, oral medications given, pulse oximetry
and cerumen removal are examples of items often not registered
as charges.
- Rerouting the billing sheets to permit MD’s to
carefully enter the proper charge and services provided
(see #3 under proper coding)
Documentation of Medical Home value to insurers
- We did a cost benefit analysis of our after hours services,
annotating our costs to provide services in our office
on weekends, weeknights and holidays. Documenting the
cost of these services to insurers underscores the money
saved in visits diverted from the ED.
- With help from our registry, we collaborated with BCBS
to evaluate ED utilization, after hours visits, and specialty
visits for our BCBS members in our CSHCN registry, and
also for a subset of CSHCN with what insurers call “high-maintenance”
diagnoses. (see listed on BCBS document). The comparison
group was other Triangle area Pediatric practices.
- BCBS data showed a statistically significant difference
in ED utilization for our CSHCN which was sustained over
the 3 years of Medical Home interventions. BCBS data documented
increased after-hours utilization and slightly higher
specialty utilization for our CSHCN. However, most recent
data suggests a decrease in subspecialty visits for our
CSHCN over the period of time of Medical Home Quality
Improvements ( which may be related to care coordination
and closer collaboration with their Medical Home.)
- Preliminary data from CHPA records suggests that our
CSHCN are not our highest utilizers of extended care hours.
This data collection continues.
Aggressive contract renegotiations
- CHPA engaged a professional to assist with contract
renegotiation with our 6
major insurers. Her expertise plus documentation of our
Medical Home efforts resulted in favorable increases in
all our reimbursement contracts.
Other Funding Sources
- BCBS Foundation was willing to fund part of our participation
fee for the Medical Home Learning Collaborative and improvements
related to the collaborative.
- Work with Title V through the Medical Home Learning
Collaborative has resulted in a three-year Medical Home
for CSHCN quality improvement grant.
Increasing MD efficiency
- Our pocket clinical directory, list of doctors for transition
to adult care, and computer connections with both Duke
and UNC Medical Centers have streamlined clinical efficiency,
permitting more time in reimbursable activities. See Recipe
# 3 above for details about clinical directory.
- Care Coordination makes dramatic increase in efficiency.
See Recipe #2 for details on the evolution of Care Coordination
Last Updated
March 19, 2007
|